🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.