🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the ideal selection for a daring scary movie centered on the biblical figure, but not for the reasons certain fans could guess. In reality, the star does not even play the central religious figure in the new film: his role is credited only as a craftsman. The actor is framed as the Joseph of this story, striving to maintain his beliefs while the teenage character (played by the young actor), his adolescent foster child, starts to exhibit supernatural abilities. The reason it's hard to imagine any other major actor taking this character is that while the role is stricken with multiple difficulties, Nicolas Cage appears nearly touchingly certain that this dark, grim feature is worth his time.

The Actor's Recent Film Selections

Cage has been spending those years more carefully lately. He yet makes more films than the majority of casual fans could possibly view — for instance, did you know that he has completed a trio of distinct frontier films recently? — but he also includes prestige independent films for example one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. This new film appears to be one of those, as it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and approaches a over-the-top description quite seriously.

The Film's Storyline and Execution

Unfortunately, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not reward viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a engagingly rootless setting, presented as inspired by an unknown scripture about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child move frequently, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion regarding The Boy’s unusual abilities. “Trouble pursues us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. That continues when dark forces target them in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start on the well-known scriptural test for The Boy.

At times, this production echoes an Exorcist-style possession movie, though not one of the central roles are explicitly taken over. On the contrary, they grow progressively isolated from each other, as these forces affect a nearby girl (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) that the son bonds with, and provides everyone disturbing images of a grim future. Cage's role especially struggles with his position within the plot, at times berating the boy he can’t fully understand.

Debate and Sensitivity

The subject matter is likely to court controversy, and the director treats it with much sensitivity — overly, maybe. The concept of a young man facing his destined offering and tempted by mysterious forces is truly terrifying, but Nathan may be hesitant regarding looking exploitative and keen to telegraph his aims, thus he frequently retreats into dimly foreboding cinematography. The roles continually reflect — FKA Twigs, who showed real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, of all things — surrenders her role to her character's costume, at times punctuated by some disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Flaws

Simultaneously, the actor toy with exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his more snickering appreciators may desire. There is a moment (featured) in previews where he flips out and screams “I’ve lost my faith!” Should such of theatrical release is a component of your Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more brazenly silly method would take better advantage of his eagerness to be extreme if needed. Instead, the film echoes the weaker direct-to-video films Cage made over the last decade — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the serious stories and ghost stories that often seem intriguing, and usually have some select memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, indeed, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Honestly, some of those, while less ambitious, were more entertaining in general. At this point I need to disregard my usual practice, not spiritual but professional: Years back, an admired senior persuaded me to eliminate adjectives like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These words convey little but a subjective and generically described restlessness, avoiding the job of clearly expressing the mental and emotional experience of watching a particular movie. It’s difficult to express boredom without sounding boring oneself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “notable.” “Say more,” in other words.

However, I admit, I was bored during much of the film. On the positive side, it is a churchy kind of stultification, not for The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but as it demands a sort of obedient endurance to sit through it. After a while soon after starting, this feature enters a repetitive rhythm of simmering distress, and fails to